Talk:State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Logo in the infobox

Supreme Court has a new logo now shouldn't that be used? DataCrusade1999 (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its auto generated. The changes needs to be made in the Template:Infobox court case, for Supreme Court of India. Wiki6995 (talk) 05:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

judgement

@Wiki6995 https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2023/45314/45314_2023_11_1501_60770_Judgement_08-Apr-2025.pdf the judgement should be added in the infobox. Lots of article have been written on the judgement I feel this article could br much more detailed.

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-sets-timeframe-for-president-on-referred-bills-decide-in-3-months-9939603/

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu-governor-case-sc-verdict-authorities-occupying-high-offices-must-be-guided-by-values-of-constitution/article69440986.ece

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-uploads-judgment-in-tn-governor-case-directs-sending-of-judgment-to-all-governors-hcs-289190

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-president-ought-to-seek-our-opinion-if-governor-reserves-bill-claiming-it-is-unconstitutional-9941143/

https://www.barandbench.com/news/governors-case-judgement-supreme-court-president-of-india-article-201

I'll add more articles as soon as I find them. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 02:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was waiting for the judgement to be published. Thank you, for sharing the file. Now, that it has been published, we should add the details from the judgment to the page. Wiki6995 (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

more sections

can we add an Issues Before the Court section and a Judgment section with subheadings concerning different aspects of this judgement like Role of the governor and judicial review among other things that the order contains. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 03:13, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we should. Wiki6995 (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

full case name

@Wiki6995 on live law website the case detail is given as Case Details: THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU v THE GOVERNOR OF TAMILNADU AND ANR| W.P.(C) No. 1239/2023 isn't this the full case name? DataCrusade1999 (talk) 03:40, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have included the full name in the infobox. Please check. Wiki6995 (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki6995 look at the detailed infobox here Marbury v. Madison I think we should atleast strive to make an infobox like Marbury v. Madison in this article. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 02:56, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

removal of significance section

@Wiki6995 any reason for the removal of significancce section? cause if it's the hindu's editorial voice then The Economist always writes in the editorial voice so I'm not sure why significance section has been removed. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 02:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

reasoning should be named analysis

reasoning should be named analysis and the judgement section should come before reasoning. what's written in reasoning seems more like analysis I think section should be named analysis and within that section we can have a reasoning sub-heading. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 12:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]